<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/11/01/word-of-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/11/01/word-of-blog/</link>
	<description>I will not explain what this weblog is all about in a few words.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/11/01/word-of-blog/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't konw who emailed you; it sounds like someone wanted to just follow the link to check it out -- link etiquette and all that. 
Recovery 2.0 is just what it appears to be: a very small group of people came together for a meeting to discuss making this better and we'll see where it goes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t konw who emailed you; it sounds like someone wanted to just follow the link to check it out &#8212; link etiquette and all that. 
Recovery 2.0 is just what it appears to be: a very small group of people came together for a meeting to discuss making this better and we&#8217;ll see where it goes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp</title>
		<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/11/01/word-of-blog/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>cp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it was weird.  The email basically said "hey, you talked about Recovery 2.0.  How's about a link?"  I guess I'd feel a whole lot better about this sort of thing if the link were direct instead of bouncing through word of blog's servers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think I'll just put a link to Recovery 2.0 on the site.  Easier....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it was weird.  The email basically said &#8220;hey, you talked about Recovery 2.0.  How&#8217;s about a link?&#8221;  I guess I&#8217;d feel a whole lot better about this sort of thing if the link were direct instead of bouncing through word of blog&#8217;s servers.</p>

<p>I think I&#8217;ll just put a link to Recovery 2.0 on the site.  Easier&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/11/01/word-of-blog/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-48</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was kind of suspicious, too, but Fred Wilson likes them ( http://avc.blogs.com/a&lt;em&gt;vc/2005/10/word&lt;/em&gt;of&lt;em&gt;blog&lt;/em&gt;co.html ), and I started using them, and I like them, too.  I didn't realize they were sending out e-mails asking people to use their buttons, though.  I'm not so sure that sounds good at all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was kind of suspicious, too, but Fred Wilson likes them ( <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a" rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a</a><em>vc/2005/10/word</em>of<em>blog</em>co.html ), and I started using them, and I like them, too.  I didn&#8217;t realize they were sending out e-mails asking people to use their buttons, though.  I&#8217;m not so sure that sounds good at all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.519 seconds -->
