<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Skeet&#8217;s Coding Blog : Visual Studio vs Eclipse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/12/jon-skeets-coding-blog-visual-studio-vs-eclipse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/12/jon-skeets-coding-blog-visual-studio-vs-eclipse/</link>
	<description>I will not explain what this weblog is all about in a few words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:27:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cp</title>
		<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/12/jon-skeets-coding-blog-visual-studio-vs-eclipse/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>cp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-224</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I&#039;m the same way.  I get so much more done with Emacs and a shell or three than I do with Eclipse.  That said, Eclipse (I have to imagine that this is also true for most of the other IDE&#039;s, but I haven&#039;t used them so I don&#039;t know) makes some things &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; easier than they would be with just a text editor.  Refactoring and abstract class code generation, for example, are a &lt;em&gt;breeze&lt;/em&gt; with Eclipse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the most wonderful feature of a lot of modern Java development environments is that they all use Ant for their build systems and don&#039;t maintain any weird sort of data external to the Ant configuration and the source, so you can do the IDE magic using the IDE when you &lt;em&gt;need&lt;/em&gt; to and then just slip back in to whatever text editor you find most comfortable.  That&#039;s my strategy these days, at any rate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m the same way.  I get so much more done with Emacs and a shell or three than I do with Eclipse.  That said, Eclipse (I have to imagine that this is also true for most of the other IDE&#8217;s, but I haven&#8217;t used them so I don&#8217;t know) makes some things <em>much</em> easier than they would be with just a text editor.  Refactoring and abstract class code generation, for example, are a <em>breeze</em> with Eclipse.</p>

<p>I think the most wonderful feature of a lot of modern Java development environments is that they all use Ant for their build systems and don&#8217;t maintain any weird sort of data external to the Ant configuration and the source, so you can do the IDE magic using the IDE when you <em>need</em> to and then just slip back in to whatever text editor you find most comfortable.  That&#8217;s my strategy these days, at any rate.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.obfuscated.org/2005/12/jon-skeets-coding-blog-visual-studio-vs-eclipse/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-223</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why do I always find it easier to code in a simple editor than these large visual studio and eclipse applicatiosn?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I always find it easier to code in a simple editor than these large visual studio and eclipse applicatiosn?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
