Comments on: High Definition http://www.obfuscated.org/2007/05/01/high-definition/ I will not explain what this weblog is all about in a few words. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:36:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: cp http://www.obfuscated.org/2007/05/01/high-definition/#comment-610 cp Thu, 03 May 2007 20:28:10 +0000 http://www.obfuscated.org/2007/05/01/high-definition/#comment-610 <p>Don't they do that with BitTorrent? I could swear that I read as much at some point.</p> <p>I can't see it working as well with this, though. It's easier to determine which 128bit number is authentic. Less so with multi-MB media files. (See the fake-warez Madonna videos with 30 seconds of video and two minutes of Madonna freaking out at the pirates.)</p> Don’t they do that with BitTorrent? I could swear that I read as much at some point.

I can’t see it working as well with this, though. It’s easier to determine which 128bit number is authentic. Less so with multi-MB media files. (See the fake-warez Madonna videos with 30 seconds of video and two minutes of Madonna freaking out at the pirates.)

]]> By: Tej http://www.obfuscated.org/2007/05/01/high-definition/#comment-609 Tej Thu, 03 May 2007 20:24:18 +0000 http://www.obfuscated.org/2007/05/01/high-definition/#comment-609 <p>The MPAA should have instead google-bombed a fake AACS key (or many fake keys). Hell, the MPAA should just start going around setting up warez servers That would have been more effective than these DMCA notices...</p> The MPAA should have instead google-bombed a fake AACS key (or many fake keys). Hell, the MPAA should just start going around setting up warez servers That would have been more effective than these DMCA notices…

]]>